Oxidative stress/free radical damage (important mechanisms involved in almost all chronic
diseases; direct cause of cellular DNA damage):
1. Raines, JK. “National Aeronautics and Space Administration Report.” Electromagnetic Field
Interactions with the Human Body: Observed Eƒƒects and Theories. (April 1981): 116 pages.
2. Hardell L, Sage C. “Biological Effects from Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Public
Exposure Standards.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. Vol. 62, no. 2. (February 2008): 104-
109. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.12.004.
3. Hazout A, Menezo Y, Madelenat P, Yazbeck C, Selva J, Cohen-Bacrie P. “Causes and Clinical
Implications of Sperm DNA Damages.” [Article in French] Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité.
Vol. 36, no. 11. (November 2008): 1109- 1117. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2008.07.017.
4. Makker K, Varghese A, Desai NR, Mouradi R, Agarwal A. “Cell Phones: Modern Man’s
Nemesis?” Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Vol. 18, no 1. (January 2009): 148-157. doi:
10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60437-3.
5. Desai NR, Kesari KK, Agarwal A. “Pathophysiology of Cell Phone Radiation: Oxidative Stress
and Carcinogenesis with Focus on Male Reproductive System.” Reproductive Biology and
Endocrinology. Vol. 7. (October 22, 2009): 114. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-114.
6. Yakymenko I, Sidorik E. “Risks of Carcinogenesis from Electromagnetic Radiation and Mobile
Telephony Devices.” Experimental Oncology. Vol. 32, no. 2. (June 2010): 54-60.
7. Yakymenko IL, Sidorik EP, Tsybulin AS. “Metabolic Changes in Cells Under Electromagnetic
Radiation of Mobile Communication Systems.” [Article in Russian] Ukrainskii Biokhimicheskii
Zhurnal (1999). Vol 83, no. 2. (March-April 2011): 20-28.
8. Consales C, Merla C, Marino C, Benassi B. “Electromagnetic Fields, Oxidative Stress, and
Neurodegeneration.” International Journal oƒ Cell Biology. Vol. 2012. (2012): 683897. doi:
10.1155/2012/683897.
9. La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE. “Effects of the Exposure to
Mobile Phones on Male Reproduction: A Review of the Literature.” Journal oƒ Andrology. Vol.
33, no. 3. (May-June 2012): 350-356. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.111.014373.
10. Pall ML. “Electromagnetic Fields Act via Activation of Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels to
Produce Beneficial or Adverse Effects.” Journal oƒ Cellular and Molecular Medicine. Vol. 17,
no. 8. (August 2013): 958-965. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12088.
11. Nazıroğlu M, Yüksel M, Köse SA, Özkaya MO. “Recent Reports of Wi-Fi and Mobile Phone-
Induced Radiation on Oxidative Stress and Reproductive Signaling Pathways in Females and
Males.” The Journal oƒ Membrane Biology. Vol. 246, no. 12. (December 2013): 869-875. doi:
10.1007/s00232-013-9597-9.
12. Pall ML. “Scientific Evidence Contradicts Findings and Assumptions of Canadian Safety
Panel 6: Microwaves Act Through Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel Activation to Induce
