53.
Kimmel S, Kuhn J, Harst W, Stever H. “Electromagnetic Radiation: Influences on Honeybees
(Apis mellifera).” IIAS-InterSymp Conƒerence. 2007.
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio
n/228510851_Electromagnetic_Radiation_Influences_on_Honeybees_Apis_mellifera
54.
Harst W, Harst JK, Stever H. “Can Electromagnetic Exposure Cause a Change in Behaviour?
Studying Possible Non-thermal Influences on Honey Bees – An Approach Within the
Framework of Educational Informatics.” Acta Systemica-IIAS International Journal. Vol 6,
no. 1. (2006): 1-6.
http://www.next-up.org/pdf/ICRW_Kuhn_Landau_study.pdf
55.
Margaritis LH, Manta AK, Kokkaliaris KD, Schiza D, Alimisis K, Barkas G, Georgiou E,
Giannakopoulou O, Kollia I, Kontogianna G, Kourouzidou A, Myari A, Roumelioti F,
Skouroliakou A, Sykioti V, Varda G, Xenos K, Ziomas K. “Drosophila Oogenesis as a
Biomarker Responding to EMF Sources.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, vol. 33,
no. 3, 2014, pp. 165-89. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.800102.
56.
Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KAG. “Worldwide Decline of the Entomofauna: A Review of its
Drivers.”
Biological
Conservation.
Vol.
232.
(2019):
8-27.
doi:
10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020.
57.
Damian Carrington. “Plummeting Insect Numbers ‘Threaten Collapse of Nature.” The
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/10/plum
meting-insect-numbers-threaten-collapse-of-nature
58.
Pall M. “Electromagnetic Fields Act Similarly in Plants as in Animals: Probable Activation of
Calcium Channels via Their Voltage Sensor.” Current Chemical Biology. Vol. 10, no. 1.
(2016). doi: 10.2174/2212796810666160419160433.
59.
Soran, ML, Stan M, Niinemets Ü, Copolovici L. “Influence of Microwave Frequency
Electromagnetic Radiation on Terpene Emission and Content in Aromatic Plants.” Journal oƒ
Plant Physiology. Vol. 171, no. 15. (2014): 1436-43. doi: 0.1016/j.jplph.2014.06.013.
60.
Beaubois E, Girard S, Lallechere S, Davies E, Paladian F, Bonnet P, Ledoigt G, Vian A.
“Intercellular Communication in Plants: Evidence for Two Rapidly Transmitted Signals
Generated in rRsponse to Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Tomato.” Plant, Cell &
Environment. Vol. 30. (2007): 840-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01669.x
61.
Waldmann-Selsam C, Balmori-de la Puente A, Breunig H, Balmori A. “Radiofrequency
Radiation Injures Trees Around Mobile Phone Base Stations.” Science oƒ the Total
Environment. Vol. 572. (2016): 554-69. doi: 10.1016/j .scitotenv.2016.08.045.
62.
Haggerty K. “Adverse Influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling Aspen
Seedlings.” International Journal oƒ Forestry Research. Vol. 2010, no. 836278. (2010). doi:
10.1155/2010/836278.
63.
Halgamuge MN. “Weak Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure from Mobile Phone Radiation
on Plants.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. Vol. 36, no. 2. (2017): 213-235. doi:
10.1080/15368378.2016.1220389.
64.
Grimaldi S, Pasquali R, Barbatano L, Lisi A, Santoro N, Serafino A, Pozzi D. “Exposure to a
50Hz Electromagnetic Field Induces Activation of the Epstein-Barr Virus Genome in
Latently Infected Human Lyphoid Cells.” Journal oƒ Environmental Pathology, Toxicology,
and Oncology. Vol. 16, no. 2-3. (1997): 205-7.