5G WIFI, ĐIỆN THOẠI DI ĐỘNG TÁC HẠI TIỀM ẨN VÀ CÁCH PHÒNG TRÁNH - Trang 284

s://www.researchgate.net/publication/225187745_Changes_in_honey_bee_behaviour_and_
biology_under_the_influence_of_cell_phone_radiations

.

53.

Kimmel S, Kuhn J, Harst W, Stever H. “Electromagnetic Radiation: Influences on Honeybees

(Apis mellifera).” IIAS-InterSymp Conƒerence. 2007.

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio

n/228510851_Electromagnetic_Radiation_Influences_on_Honeybees_Apis_mellifera

.

54.

Harst W, Harst JK, Stever H. “Can Electromagnetic Exposure Cause a Change in Behaviour?

Studying Possible Non-thermal Influences on Honey Bees – An Approach Within the
Framework of Educational Informatics.” Acta Systemica-IIAS International Journal. Vol 6,
no. 1. (2006): 1-6.

http://www.next-up.org/pdf/ICRW_Kuhn_Landau_study.pdf

.

55.

Margaritis LH, Manta AK, Kokkaliaris KD, Schiza D, Alimisis K, Barkas G, Georgiou E,

Giannakopoulou O, Kollia I, Kontogianna G, Kourouzidou A, Myari A, Roumelioti F,
Skouroliakou A, Sykioti V, Varda G, Xenos K, Ziomas K. “Drosophila Oogenesis as a
Biomarker Responding to EMF Sources.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, vol. 33,
no. 3, 2014, pp. 165-89. doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.800102.

56.

Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KAG. “Worldwide Decline of the Entomofauna: A Review of its

Drivers.”

Biological

Conservation.

Vol.

232.

(2019):

8-27.

doi:

10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020.

57.

Damian Carrington. “Plummeting Insect Numbers ‘Threaten Collapse of Nature.” The

Guardian. February 10, 2019.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/10/plum

meting-insect-numbers-threaten-collapse-of-nature

.

58.

Pall M. “Electromagnetic Fields Act Similarly in Plants as in Animals: Probable Activation of

Calcium Channels via Their Voltage Sensor.” Current Chemical Biology. Vol. 10, no. 1.
(2016). doi: 10.2174/2212796810666160419160433.

59.

Soran, ML, Stan M, Niinemets Ü, Copolovici L. “Influence of Microwave Frequency

Electromagnetic Radiation on Terpene Emission and Content in Aromatic Plants.” Journal oƒ
Plant Physiology
. Vol. 171, no. 15. (2014): 1436-43. doi: 0.1016/j.jplph.2014.06.013.

60.

Beaubois E, Girard S, Lallechere S, Davies E, Paladian F, Bonnet P, Ledoigt G, Vian A.

“Intercellular Communication in Plants: Evidence for Two Rapidly Transmitted Signals
Generated in rRsponse to Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Tomato.” Plant, Cell &
Environment
. Vol. 30. (2007): 840-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01669.x

61.

Waldmann-Selsam C, Balmori-de la Puente A, Breunig H, Balmori A. “Radiofrequency

Radiation Injures Trees Around Mobile Phone Base Stations.” Science oƒ the Total
Environment
. Vol. 572. (2016): 554-69. doi: 10.1016/j .scitotenv.2016.08.045.

62.

Haggerty K. “Adverse Influence of Radio Frequency Background on Trembling Aspen

Seedlings.” International Journal oƒ Forestry Research. Vol. 2010, no. 836278. (2010). doi:
10.1155/2010/836278.

63.

Halgamuge MN. “Weak Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure from Mobile Phone Radiation

on Plants.” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. Vol. 36, no. 2. (2017): 213-235. doi:
10.1080/15368378.2016.1220389.

64.

Grimaldi S, Pasquali R, Barbatano L, Lisi A, Santoro N, Serafino A, Pozzi D. “Exposure to a

50Hz Electromagnetic Field Induces Activation of the Epstein-Barr Virus Genome in
Latently Infected Human Lyphoid Cells.” Journal oƒ Environmental Pathology, Toxicology,
and Oncology.
Vol. 16, no. 2-3. (1997): 205-7.

Liên Kết Chia Sẽ

** Đây là liên kết chia sẻ bới cộng đồng người dùng, chúng tôi không chịu trách nhiệm gì về nội dung của các thông tin này. Nếu có liên kết nào không phù hợp xin hãy báo cho admin.