Radiation.” Bioelectromagnetics. Vol. 29, no. 3. (April 2008): 219–232. doi: 10.1002/bem.20386.
5.
Krause CM, Pesonen M, Haarala BC, Hamalainen H. “Effects of Pulsed and Continuous Wave
902 MHz Mobile Phone Exposure on Brain Oscillatory Activity during Cognitive
Processing.” Bioelectromagnetics. Vol. 28, no. 4. (May 2007): 296–308. doi:
10.1002/bem.20300.
6.
Papageorgiou CC, Nanou ED, Tsiafakis VG, Kapareliotis E, Kontoangelos KA, Capsalis CN,
Rabavilas AD, Soldatos CR. “Acute Mobile Phone Effects on PreAttentive Operation.”
Neuroscience
Letters.
Vol.
397,
no.
1–2.
(April
2006):
99–103.
doi:
10.1016/j.neulet.2005.12.001.
7.
Maier R, Greter SE, Maier N. “Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Cognitive Processes
- a Pilot Study on Pulsed Field Interference with Cognitive Regeneration.” Acta Neurologica
Scandinavica. Vol. 110, no. 1. (July 2004): 46–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00260.x.
8.
Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Cartellieri M, Denk-Linnert DM, Katzinger M,
Ehrenberger K, Kundi M. “Tinnitus and Mobile Phone Use.” Occupational and
Environmental
Medicine.
Vol.
67,
no.
12.
(December
2010):
804–808.
doi:
10.1136/oem.2009.048116.
9.
Holgers K-M. “Tinnitus in 7-Year-Old Children.” European Journal oƒ Pediatrics. Vol. 162,
no. 4. (April 2003): 276–78. doi: 10.1007/s00431-003-1183-1.
10.
Holgers K-M and Juul J. “The Suffering of Tinnitus in Childhood and Adolescence.”
International Journal oƒ Audiology. Vol. 45, no. 5. (May 2006): 267–72.
doi:
10.1080/14992020500485668.
11.
Bormusov E, Andle U, Sharon N, Schächter L, Lahav A, Dovrat A. “Non-Thermal
Electromagnetic Radiation Damage to Lens Epithelium.” Open Ophthalmology Journal. Vol.
2. (May 21, 2008): 102–106. doi: 10.2174/1874364100802010102.
12.
Yu Y, Yao K. “Non-Thermal Cellular Effects of Low-Power Microwave Radiation on the Lens
and Lens Epithelial Cells.” Journal oƒ International Medical Research. Vol. 38, no. 3. (June
2010): 729–736. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800301.
13.
Parathath SR, Parathath S, Tsirka SE. “Nitric Oxide Mediates Neurodegeneration and
Breakdown of the Blood-Brain Barrier in tPA-Dependent Excitotoxic Injury in Mice.”
Journal oƒ Cell Science. Vol. 119. (January 15, 2006): 339–349. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02734.
14.
Salford LG, Brun A, Sturesson K, Eberhardt JL, Persson BR. “Permeability of the Blood-
Brain Barrier Induced by 915 MHz Electromagnetic Radiation, Continuous Wave and
Modulated at 8, 16, 50, and 200 Hz.” Microscopy Research and Technique. Vol. 27, no. 6.
(April 15, 1994): 535–42. doi: 10.1002 /jemt.1070270608.
15.
Nittby H, Brun A, Eberhardt J, Malmgren L, Persson BR, Salford LG. “Increased Blood-Brain
Barrier Permeability in Mammalian Brain 7 Days After Exposure to the Radiation from a GSM-
900 Mobile Phone.” Pathophysiology. Vol. 16, no. 2–3. (August 2009): 103–12. doi:
10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.001.
16.
Tang J, Zhang Y, Yang L, Chen Q, Tan L, Zuo S, Feng H, Chen Z, Zhu G. “Exposure to 900
MHz Electromagnetic Fields Activates the mkp-1/ERK Pathway and Causes Blood-Brain
Barrier Damage and Cognitive Impairment in Rats.” Brain Research. Vol. 1601. (March 19,
2015): 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j .brainres.2015.01.019.
