Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, 1967); A. Kaplan,
The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for
Behavioral Research (Scranton, PA: Chandler,
1964); R. Kaplan, “The Role for Empirical
Research in Management Accounting,”
Accounting, Organizations and Society 4, no.
5 (1986): 429–452; T. Kuhn, The Structure of
Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1962); M. Poole and A. Van
de Ven, “Using Paradox to Build
Management and Organization Theories,”
Academy of Management Review 14, no. 4 .
1989): 562–578; K. Popper, The Logic of
Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic
Books, 1959); F. Roethlisberger, The Elusive
Phenomena (Boston: Harvard Business
School Division of Research, 1977); Arthur
Stinchcombe, “The Logic of Scientific
Inference,” chapter 2 in Constructing Social
Theories (New York: Harcourt, Brace &
World, 1968); Andrew Van de Ven,
“Professional Science for a Professional
School,” in Breaking the Code of Change,
eds. Michael Beer and Nitin Nohria (Boston:
Harvard Business School Press, 2000); Karl
E.
Weick,
“Theory
Construction
as
Disciplined Imagination,” Academy of
Management Review 14, no. 4, (1989): 516–
531; and R. Yin, Case Study Research
(Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1984).
18. Điều chúng tôi muốn nói là thành công
của một giả thuyết phải được đo bằng độ
